Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556420›Full record

ReviewThe plant genome2025

Empowering plant epigenetics to breed resilience of crops: From nucleolar dominance to transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.

Zengjian Jeffrey Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zengjian Jeffrey ChenDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-8036

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Genome DuplicationR01GM067015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI CHEN, ZENGJIAN JEFFREY · 2003 to 2009
$1.4M
Developmental and Epigenetic Regulation of Hybrid VigorR01GM109076 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI LLOYD, ALAN M · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
Cotton 14-371Cotton 20-799Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 1025947Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 1238048Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 1444552Division of Integrative Organismal Systems and 0733857Division of Integrative Organismal Systems IOS1739092D. J. Sibley Centennial ProfessorshipNIGMS NIH HHS GM067015NIGMS NIH HHS GM109076NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067015NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109076Stengl-Wyer Endowment Research grantThe Winkler Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in genomic and epigenetic research in both plants and animals have transformed breeding methods and biotechnological strategies for crop improvement, particularly in the face of extreme weather challenges. These breakthroughs in plant biology and agriculture have laid a strong foundation for ensuring food security, promoting environmental sustainability, enhancing nutritional health, and driving basic science advances, as exemplified by Mendel's discovery of genetic principles and McClintock's discovery of transposable elements. Plant epigenetics has held a transformative potential for developing high-yielding and resilient crops. In this review, I will examine various relevant epigenetic phenomena, including nucleolar dominance, paramutation, imprinting, somaclonal variation, and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, to explore strategies for overcoming yield limitations in an increasingly volatile climate. This perspective aligns with the vision for plant breeding and sustainable agriculture championed by the late Professor Ronald L. Phillips.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalEpigenesis, GeneticPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID40556420
PMCPMC12188179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.