ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Variation of the Thread Thickness After Thread Lifting: An Ultrasonographic Evaluation.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variation of the Thread Thickness After Thread Lifting: An Ultrasonographic Evaluation.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Synergistic Effects of Thread Lifting, Autologous Fat Grafting, and Multi-Modal Laser Therapy in Facial Rejuvenation.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThread lifting for the management of skin sagging is a well-established method of noninvasive facial rejuvenation; however, the literature regarding follow-up with ultrasound imaging is sparse.
aimsThe aim of this study was to assess the long-term stability of nonabsorbable silicone threads by monitoring any changes in their thickness over time. Using ultrasound imaging, we tracked the threads' dimensional changes in patients to determine whether the threads maintain their structural integrity during the follow-up period. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients who underwent thread lifting with silicone threads. Ultrasonography was used at follow-up points to assess various parameters. These included the visibility of the threads, any changes in their thickness over time, potential migration of the threads in relation to the cannula entry point, as well as variations in echogenicity, which could suggest alterations in the thread material or surrounding tissue, along with any associated complications.
resultsThe patients who had their follow-up ultrasound done 6 months or less after the procedure had a lower mean thread thickness compared to those who were evaluated after 6 months. After 6 months, however, the thread thickness remains within a fixed range. The most common adverse effect was swelling. There was no migration in any of the patients.
conclusionsThread lifting is a procedure with long-term durability. Ultrasound imaging can be utilized as a tool for follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.