Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556329›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of immunology2025

γδ T Cells and Inborn Errors of Immunity.

Sagar, Stephan Ehl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

SagarDepartment of Medicine II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-4704
Stephan EhlInstitute for Immunodeficiency, Center for Chronic Immunodeficiency, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9265-2721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma delta (γδ) T cells are pivotal in diverse immune responses, encompassing defense against infections, cancer surveillance, and tissue repair. Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are rare genetic conditions disrupting human immune system development and function, with some impacting γδ T cells. In this review, we focus on IEI leading to a relative increase or decrease of γδ T cells compared to αβ T cells. We discuss how these disorders provide unique insights, in particular concerning the importance of signaling pathways for human αβ versus γδ T cell development, function, and homeostasis. Wherever suitable, we also include data from respective mouse models of IEIs that corroborate patient observations but also illustrate relevant species differences. This comparative approach identifies gaps in knowledge and defines areas for future research. Overall, this review underscores the relevance of IEIs in elucidating the development and function of human γδ T cells with potential implications for diagnosing and treating patients with immune disorders.

Indexed as

Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAnimalsHumansMiceSignal TransductionReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltahumaninborn errors of immunitymouseprimary immunodeficiencyγδ T cells

Identifiers

PMID40556329
PMCPMC12188109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.