ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2025
Deciphering the effectiveness of computed tomography scoring systems in improving mortality prediction for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation between perioperative red blood cell transfusion strategy and 3-month neurological outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy for traumatic brain injury.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraumatic brain injury is associated with adverse prognoses and significant neurological impairments that negatively affect patients' quality of life and physiological well-being. The aim of this study was to compare various computed tomography (CT) scoring systems in order to evaluate their effectiveness in predicting mortality and in risk stratification.
methodsThe evolution and trends in the use of CT scoring systems were analyzed through a bibliometric analysis of 72 Scopus-indexed documents using VOSviewer ver. 1.6.19. A systematic review was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, with data obtained from PubMed Advance, Scopus, and Google Scholar for the period 2003-2024. A total of 198 journals were identified and subsequently filtered down to 6 that met the inclusion criteria.
resultsThe bibliometric analysis revealed a progressive shift toward the use of CT scoring systems for novel diagnostic purposes and mortality prediction. The Rotterdam CT score demonstrated the highest total link strength and was most frequently published in 2017. In contrast, the Marshall CT score was more widely referenced in studies published after 2020. Despite being recognized for its sensitivity, the Helsinki CT score has not garnered equivalent research attention. Furthermore, the review suggested that the Rotterdam CT score is superior in predicting mortality among traumatic brain injury patients, with the Marshall CT score also demonstrating potential.
conclusionsA review of the extant literature indicates that the Helsinki CT score exhibits the highest predictive accuracy, effectively estimating both mortality probability and long-term prognosis. Since 2015, research on the Helsinki CT score has steadily increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.