Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556265›Full record

ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2025

Testing predictions of spatial segregation of the sexes and life-history theory in three species of the dioecious genus Baccharis L. from southeastern Brazil.

H D Safford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H D SaffordDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0608-6728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I report results of a field study testing predictions of life history theory and spatial segregation of the sexes in three dioecious shrub species of Baccharis (L.) that co-occur in the eastern Brazilian Highlands. Baccharis is one of the most speciose genera of dioecious plants, yet the ecological implications of dioecy are poorly understood in the genus. I conducted statistical analyses to evaluate three hypotheses related to: (1) sex ratios and their relationship to spatial environmental gradients, (2) differences in reproductive and vegetative allocation among the sexes and their relationship to environmental gradients, and (3) the potential for notable divergence in response, based on Baccharis biology. I found that one species, B. opuntioides, met almost all theoretical expectations of life history theory and spatial segregation of the sexes, while another, B. platypoda, met some of them but did not meet others. The third species, B. myriocephala, met none of the theoretical expectations. For both B. myriocephala and B. platypoda, relationships between plant size and allocation to reproductive or vegetative biomass in males or females sometimes ran counter to life history predictions. Earlier studies suggested inconsistency in Baccharis' adherence to predictions of dioecy-driven resource allocation and spatial segregation patterns, perhaps driven by idiosyncrasies of genus biology. My study broadly supports that notion, but more robust testing of theoretical expectations in Baccharis will require more attention to the nature and length of resource gradients that are studied, and other complicating factors like intraspecific variance in peak flowering times.

Indexed as

BaccharisLife History TraitsBrazilReproductionSex RatioBaccharisBrazildioecyreproductive allocationresource allocationspatial segregation of the sexes

Identifiers

PMID40556265
PMCPMC12477304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.