Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556042›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025

Women's Childbirth Experiences in the WILL Randomised Trial (When to Induce Labour to Limit Risk in Pregnancy Hypertension): A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Sue Tohill, Katie Kirkham, Eleni Gkini, Catherine A Moakes, Sergio A Silverio, Gillian Horgan, Ben Wills, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Joel Singer, Clive Stubbs and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sue TohillMaternity Services, Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2344-4347
Katie KirkhamBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Eleni GkiniBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Catherine A MoakesBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471
Gillian HorganDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ben WillsSands Charity, London, UK.
Jennifer A HutcheonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-3423
Joel SingerSchool of Population and Public Health and Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Clive StubbsBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jim G ThorntonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-6876
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-3070
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-610X
WILL Trial Study Group

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research 16/167/123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare childbirth satisfaction in women with chronic or gestational hypertension, randomised to 'planned early term birth at 38

designRandomised trial.

settingForty-two consultant-led maternity units, United Kingdom. POPULATION: 357/403 women randomised completed the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).

methodsMixed-methods analysis of the 22-item CEQ, assessing: 'Own capacity', 'Professional support', 'Perceived safety' and 'Participation'. Directed content analysis sorted free-text comments into themes covered by the CEQ and two additional themes.

main outcome measuresCEQ scores overall and by domain.

resultsIn intervention (vs. control) groups, the CEQ was completed by 177/202, 88.1% (vs. 180/202, 89.1%) participants, and 378 free-text comments were made by 93/177, 52.5% (vs. 98/180, 54.4%) participants. There was no significant difference in CEQ scores overall (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 3.1 ± 0.4, respectively) or by domain ('Own capacity' [2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5, respectively]; 'Professional support' [3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.6, respectively]; 'Perceived safety' [3.2 ± 0.6 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, respectively]; and 'Participation' [2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6]). Most comments were positive (222/378, 58.7%), and about 'Relational care and care interactions' (CEQ 'Professional support'). Neither the number nor positivity of comments appeared to differ between groups.

conclusionFor women with chronic or gestational hypertension who remain well at term, we found no difference in childbirth experience between women randomised to planned early term birth versus usual care at term. Shared decisions about timing of birth may be more influenced by differences in clinical outcomes and costs.

trial registrationISRCTN: 77258279.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedLabor, InducedParturitionPatient SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomchildbirth experiencechronic hypertensiongestational hypertensionhypertension in pregnancylabour inductionmaternal complicationsneonatal morbidity

Identifiers

PMID40556042
PMCPMC12315064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.