ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2025
Robust molecular subgrouping and reference-free aneuploidy detection in medulloblastoma using low-depth whole genome bisulfite sequencing.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and characterization of a novel human ampullary carcinoma cell line derived from a Chinese patient.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Strategies for the Molecular Classification of Medulloblastoma.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medulloblastoma comprises four principal molecular disease groups and their component subgroups, each with distinct molecular and clinical features. Group assignment is currently achieved diagnostically using Illumina DNA methylation microarray. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) capacity is rapidly expanding in the clinical setting and the development of platform-independent, sequence-based assays of molecular group offers significant potential. Specifically, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) enables assessment of genome-wide methylation status at single-base resolution, however its routine application has been limited by high DNA input requirements, cost, and a lack of pipelines tailored to more rapidly-acquired and cost-effective low-depth (< 10x) sequencing data. We utilised WGBS data for 69 medulloblastomas, comprising 35 in-house low-depth (~ 10x) and 34 publicly available high-depth (~ 30x) samples, alongside cerebellar controls (n = 8), all with matched DNA methylation microarray data. We assessed quality (QC) and imputation approaches using low-pass WGBS data, assessed inter-platform correlation and identified molecular groups and subgroups by directly integrating matched/associated loci from WGBS sample data with the MNP classifier probeset. We further assessed and optimised reference-free aneuploidy detection using low-pass WGBS and assessed concordance with microarray-derived calls. We developed and optimised pipelines for processing, QC, and analysis of low-pass WGBS data, suitable for routine molecular subgrouping and reference-free aneuploidy assessment. We demonstrate that low-pass WGBS data can (i) be integrated into existing array-trained models with high assignment probabilities for both principal molecular groups (97% concordance) and molecular subgroups (94.2% concordance), and (ii) detect clinically relevant focal copy number changes, including SNCAIP, with greater sensitivity than microarray approaches. Low-pass WGBS performs equivalently to array-based methods at comparable cost. Finally, its ascertainment of the full methylome enables elucidation of additional biological complexity and inter-tumoural heterogeneity that has hitherto been inaccessible. These findings provide proof-of-concept for clinical adoption of low-pass WGBS, applied using standard WGS technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.