Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556023›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025

Tourniquet-related complications in extremity injuries: a scoping review of the literature.

Anaida Xacur-Trabulce, Gessner Casas-Fuentes, Veronica Ruiz-Vasconcelos, Marianne Marchini Reitz, Sharon M Henry, Thomas M Scalea, Marcelo A F Ribeiro

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Under pressure - a sensor-based analysis of simulated prehospital pressure dressing application for hemorrhage management.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anaida Xacur-TrabulceGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Angeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0007-0236-4173
Gessner Casas-FuentesGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Angeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0008-3908-5650
Veronica Ruiz-VasconcelosGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Angeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0006-6115-1488
Marianne Marchini ReitzGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital Municipal Dr. José de Carvalho Florence, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5154-7004
Sharon M HenryR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3032-5880
Thomas M ScaleaR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8794-4108
Marcelo A F RibeiroR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA. mfribeiro@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9826-4722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTourniquets are crucial for controlling life-threatening hemorrhage and, therefore, in preventing avoidable deaths in both military and civilian settings. Its increased use since the launch of the Stop the Bleed campaign, however, has raised concerns regarding possible complications associated with its application, including limb ischemia and amputation. The objective of this study was to synthesize the existing evidence regarding complications associated with the use of tourniquets for extremity injuries and identify gaps in knowledge to guide future research on this topic.

methodsA review of the literature between 2016 and 2024 was performed including open access retrospective studies, case series, clinical cases, and systematic reviews that addressed tourniquet use in a civilian or military setting in patients with extremity injuries, following the PRISMA-ScR 2018 checklist. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases were queried, identifying 1,398 articles on the use of extremity tourniquets in military and civilian contexts, focusing on complications. Of these, 1,343 articles were excluded due to duplication or irrelevance based on the title. From the 55 remaining, 37 were excluded after abstract review for not meeting inclusion criteria. Of the 18 full-text articles reviewed, 10 were excluded due to insufficient data, leaving 8 studies for detailed analysis.

resultsProlonged application in emergency situations may lead to severe complications, such as nerve injuries, post-tourniquet syndrome and thromboembolic event risks. Nerve palsy has been identified as the most prevalent complication associated with prolonged tourniquet use.

conclusionImproved training is essential to help providers accurately assess bleeding severity and apply appropriate interventions, reducing complications and enhancing outcomes. Future research opportunities should consider: (1) prospective interventional randomized controlled studies aiming to compare the use of tourniquets to different methods of hemorrhage control; (2) development and validation of easy-to-use scores predicting complications and the need of amputation in both civilian and military settings including upper and lower extremities, to better guide clinical decisions and future guidelines; (3) development of better ways to teach lay providers to recognize life threatening bleeding; and (4) development of guidelines for timing of tourniquet loosening, removal or conversion.

Indexed as

ExtremitiesTourniquetsHemorrhageHumansComplicationsExtremity tourniquetMilitary and civilian settingStop the bleed campaign.TourniquetTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40556023
PMCPMC12188649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.