Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40556022›Full record

ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2025

Highly efficient stacking ensemble learning model for automated keratoconus screening.

Zahra J Muhsin, Rami Qahwaji, Ibrahim Ghafir, Mo'ath AlShawabkeh, Muawyah Al Bdour, Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, Majid Al-Taee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zahra J MuhsinFaculty of Engineering and Digital Technologies, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3309-1706
Rami QahwajiFaculty of Engineering and Digital Technologies, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK. r.s.r.Qahwaji@bradford.ac.uk.
Ibrahim GhafirFaculty of Engineering and Digital Technologies, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
Mo'ath AlShawabkehDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Muawyah Al BdourSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Saif Aldeen AlRyalatSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Majid Al-TaeeIndependent Consultant of Computing and Systems Engineering, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite extensive research on keratoconus (KC) detection with traditional machine learning models, stacking ensemble learning approaches remain underexplored. This paper presents a stacking ensemble learning method to enhance automated KC screening.

methodsThis study utilizes a clinical dataset containing detailed corneal data from 2491 cases classified as non-KC (NKC), subclinical KC (SCKC) and clinical KC (CKC). Each cornea is represented by 79 features extracted from Pentacam imaging. Following extensive pre-processing, key corneal features that are strongly correlated with the target diagnosis are identified. These features are the keratometry of the steepest anterior point, surface variance index, vertical asymmetry index, height decentration index, and height asymmetry index. A novel stacking ensemble model is developed using the selected features to improve corneal classification into NKC, SCKC, and CKC by integrating top tree-based classifiers (random forest, gradient boosting, decision trees) with a support vector machine meta-classifier.

resultsThe pre-processing and feature selection techniques reduced the model's parameters to just 6.33% of the original dataset, improving classification performance, and cutting over 85% of the training time. The performance of the developed model was validated and tested on unseen data. Experimental results showed that the model outperforms existing studies, achieving 99.72% accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1, and F2 scores, with a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.995. It accurately classified all NKC and CKC cases, with just one misclassification involving an SCKC case. The model also demonstrated consistent performance on 100 additional unseen test cases, underscoring its generalizability and robustness in KC screening.

conclusionsBy combining the strengths of diverse base models and key Pentacam indices, the stacking ensemble approach ensures reliable, accurate KC screening, providing clinicians with an automated tool for early detection and better patient management.

Indexed as

Corneal tomographyEnsemble learningFeature selectionKeratoconus screeningStacking ensemble learning

Identifiers

PMID40556022
PMCPMC12186405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.