ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2025
Highly efficient stacking ensemble learning model for automated keratoconus screening.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global burden and cross-country inequalities of age-related eye diseases from 1990 to 2021: a comprehensive analysis of temporal trends and socioeconomic disparities.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2026Article
- Prediction of Lithium Therapeutic Target Attainment in Adolescents Using an XGBoost Model: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite extensive research on keratoconus (KC) detection with traditional machine learning models, stacking ensemble learning approaches remain underexplored. This paper presents a stacking ensemble learning method to enhance automated KC screening.
methodsThis study utilizes a clinical dataset containing detailed corneal data from 2491 cases classified as non-KC (NKC), subclinical KC (SCKC) and clinical KC (CKC). Each cornea is represented by 79 features extracted from Pentacam imaging. Following extensive pre-processing, key corneal features that are strongly correlated with the target diagnosis are identified. These features are the keratometry of the steepest anterior point, surface variance index, vertical asymmetry index, height decentration index, and height asymmetry index. A novel stacking ensemble model is developed using the selected features to improve corneal classification into NKC, SCKC, and CKC by integrating top tree-based classifiers (random forest, gradient boosting, decision trees) with a support vector machine meta-classifier.
resultsThe pre-processing and feature selection techniques reduced the model's parameters to just 6.33% of the original dataset, improving classification performance, and cutting over 85% of the training time. The performance of the developed model was validated and tested on unseen data. Experimental results showed that the model outperforms existing studies, achieving 99.72% accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1, and F2 scores, with a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.995. It accurately classified all NKC and CKC cases, with just one misclassification involving an SCKC case. The model also demonstrated consistent performance on 100 additional unseen test cases, underscoring its generalizability and robustness in KC screening.
conclusionsBy combining the strengths of diverse base models and key Pentacam indices, the stacking ensemble approach ensures reliable, accurate KC screening, providing clinicians with an automated tool for early detection and better patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.