ArticleBMC global and public health2025
Using implementation science to enhance specialized mental health supervision: pre-implementation assessment and rapid qualitative methods.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning from lived experiences to address public health concerns in incarceration and community corrections.BMC global and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough implementation science methods have been widely used across all sectors of healthcare, they are less commonly used to promote health interventions within criminal legal system settings. This gap in the research is problematic given the need for effective treatments to address comparatively worse health and mental health outcomes among people involved in the criminal legal system. Additionally, there have been relatively few published studies documenting methods at the pre-implementation phase. This article reports on a pre-implementation assessment conducted as part of a grant-funded initiative with a statewide community supervision agency to address key limitations in the state's Specialized Mental Health Supervision program by piloting two implementation strategies: clinical case consultation and enhancing mental health officers' relationships with behavioral health service providers.
methodsThe purpose of this study was to provide agency leaders with practical and timely information to make decisions regarding their plan for rolling out the initiative. Within a 30-day timeframe, the research team conducted 22 brief, semi-structured interviews with members of the implementation team and community supervision officers and their supervisors. The team then used rapid qualitative analysis methods to identify potential challenges and facilitators of the implementation strategies and make recommendations to improve implementation.
resultsAlthough participants indicated that considering mental health symptoms was a top factor in caseload assignment and step-down, they believed other stabilizing factors (e.g., housing, employment) and risk for re-offense should also be considered. Participants described the need for more training on mental health topics and the local service system. Lastly, the agency learned about factors that could impact the consultation process (e.g., trusting the consultant, maintaining a growth mindset) and relationships with behavioral health service providers (e.g., having a common language between community supervision and behavioral health), officer workload, and leadership engagement.
conclusionsPre-implementation assessments, including those conducted using rapid analysis methods, should be routine practices when launching an intervention or an implementation strategy under real-world conditions. These assessments provide agencies and their research partners with actionable and tailored information that can enhance the pace and effectiveness of their implementation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.