ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025
Completely thoracoscopic surgical stabilization of rib fractures: balancing minimally invasive benefits against technique-specific complications: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid versus single internal fixation strategies in minimally invasive surgery for multiple rib fractures: a retrospective comparative analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Observational
- Directed acoustic shadow enhancement for pre-incision ultrasound localization and precise incision planning in multiple rib fractures undergoing SSRF: a retrospective comparative feasibility study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes and complications of completely thoracoscopic surgical stabilization of rib fractures (cTSSRF) in patients with rib fractures in the posterior chest wall area.
methodA retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 patients who underwent completely thoracoscopic surgical stabilization of rib fractures (cTSSRF) between September 2019 and October 2023. Clinical data were gathered to compare and analyze the clinical outcomes of complications of cTSSRF and open surgical stabilization of rib fractures (oSSRF).
resultsA total of 201 rib fractures were repaired in 30 patients, including 79 rib fractures in the posterior chest wall (an average of 2.63 rib fractures/person) that were fixed by cTSSRF, and 122 rib fractures (an average of 4.06 rib fractures/person) fixed by oSSRF. No obvious thoracic collapse deformity was observed postoperatively in any patient. The median duration of chest tube removal after surgery was 3 (3-4) days, and the chest drainage volume was 586.33 ± 232.4 ml. The numeric rating scale score (NRS) was 3 (2-3.25), which was significantly lower than the preoperative score of 7 (6-8), z = -4.826, P < 0.001). The rate of implant displacement of the cTSSRF was 6.33% (5/79), which was significantly higher than that in the oSSRF of 0(0/122), χ2 = 5.53, P = 0.019. The rates of fracture malalignment were high in the cTSSRF (21.52% [20/79] vs2.46% [3/122], P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative encapsulated pleural effusion-defined as a maximum anteroposterior fluid thickness > 20 mm surrounding the internal fixation device on axial CT scans-was 46.7% (14/30 cases) during the 7-14 day postoperative period. All patients were followed-up in outpatient clinics or by telephone for 6-24 months, and all resumed their work capacity without obvious symptoms of chest discomfort.
conclusionThe application of cTSSRF is a safe, feasible and minimally invasive surgical option, particularly in cases of rib fractures in the posterior chest wall, which are challenging to address using conventional open surgery. However, the postoperative implant displacement and fracture malalignment rates are higher than those observed in conventional surgery, which still needs to require careful evaluation of the risks and benefits of routinely performing cTSSRF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.