ArticleCancer cell international2025
A novel mesothelioma molecular classification based on malignant cell differentiation.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high heterogeneity and multi-directional poor differentiation of tumor cells in mesothelioma (MESO) contributes to tumor growth and malignant biological behaviors. However, a molecular classification based on differentiated states of tumor cells remains void.
methodsWe performed dimensionality reduction analysis on the single-cell RNA sequencing profiles available from the GEO database, to visualize the cell types in MESO. Multi-omics analysis was done to supplement the plausibility of classification. We also constructed regulatory networks to detect the function of important tumor cell differential genes (TCDGs) in the MESO.
resultsFollowing twice dimensionality reduction analysis and clustering, eight malignant cell subtypes in the MESO were visualized. According to the expression of TCDGs, MESO was classified into three subtypes (Malignant differentiation-related MESO, Benign differentiation-related MESO, and Neutral differentiation-related MESO) with prognostic differences. The prediction model was built by 12 key TCDGs (ALDH2, HP, CASP1, RTP4, PDZK1IP1, TOP2A, LOXL2, CKS2, SPARC, TLCD3A, C6orf99, and SERPINH1) and validated with high accuracy. In the regulatory networks of MESO subtypes, RTP4, CASP1, MYO1B, SLC7A5, LOXL2, and GHR were labeled as key genes. A total of 14 potential inhibitors were predicted. Clinical specimens validated the reliability of the clinical subtyping of MESO patients.
conclusionThe novel molecular classification system and the prognostic prediction model might benefit the management of MESO patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.