ArticleReproductive health2025
Intersectoral interventions: integration for impact on preterm birth.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Born too soon: global epidemiology of preterm birth and drivers for change.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Born Too Soon: Priorities to improve the prevention and care of preterm birth.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Born Too Soon: Care for small and sick newborns, evidence for investment and implementation.Reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
progressThe last two decades have seen a growing focus on intersectoral interventions to improve maternal and newborn health and well-being outcomes, as reflected in efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and advance the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Preterm births are linked to cross-sectoral determinants that affect health outcomes and human capital across the life-course, necessitating an intersectoral approach that addresses these multifaceted challenges. PROGRAMMATIC PRIORITIES: Recognizing that social, biological and economic determinants significantly influence health outcomes, it is critical that robust health systems are reinforced by a comprehensive intersectoral approach. Evidence suggests that the factors influencing preterm birth, and the health of small and sick newborns are vast and varied, requiring interventions that address equity and rights, education, economic factors, environmental conditions, and emergency responses, i.e., a new framework entitled "five Es". PIVOTS: Improving outcomes for newborns, including preterm and small for gestational age babies, and preventing stillbirths, requires enhanced measurement and accountability within intersectoral programs across the 'five Es'. Investment in equity-focused, gender-transformative, and rights-based policies and programs across various sectors is crucial. Priority areas include ensuring equitable and inclusive education, particularly comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education; developing innovative financing schemes that protect and support families with complicated pregnancies and vulnerable infants; creating environmentally adaptive systems that prioritize maternal and newborn health; and implementing emergency response plans that guarantee the continuity of maternal and newborn health services. Evidence-based intersectoral interventions offer a promising pathway to reducing preterm births and improving health outcomes across generations. By addressing the five Es, intersectoral interventions can create a healthier future for preterm babies, children, adolescents, women, and society as a whole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.