Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Cost-efficacy evaluation of a mindfulness-based program added to treatment as usual for the treatment of chronic migraine associated to medication overuse headache.
Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03671681 (A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Cost-efficacy of Adding on a Mindfulness-based Therapy to Standard Medical Prophylaxis in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Migraine Associated to Medication Overuse Following Structured Withdrawal), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Cost-efficacy of Adding on a Mindfulness-based Therapy to Standard Medical Prophylaxis in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Migraine Associated to Medication Overuse Following Structured Withdrawal: the Mind-CM Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Migraine and Work-Disability: New Treatments Reduce Work-Related Burden Among Migraine Population.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic Migraine associated to Medication Overuse Headache (CM-MOH) causes considerable costs in reason of healthcare costs and loss of productivity. Recently, a mindfulness-based program added to treatment as usual (TaU) proved efficacy compared to TaU alone in patients with CM-MOH. This study aims to assess the cost-efficacy of such multimodal treatment protocol.
methodsPatients with CM-MOH filled in a specific protocol aimed to assess direct healthcare costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs, referred to the three months before starting the treatment protocol. Repeated measure analyses were employed to compare total costs’ reductions between the two group of patients. Then, we compared the delta in total costs after allocation to the two treatment arms using the independent-sample t-test.
results154 patients completed the 12-months follow-up. Over the period, CM-MOH cost was reduced from 2620€ (95% CI: 2146–3094€) to 1603€ (95% CI: 1182–2023€) in the TaU group, and from 2978€ (95% CI: 2293–3656€) to 752€ (95% CI: 539–965€) in the TaU + MIND group. The time*group interaction analysis on cost reduction indicated a significant difference (F = 2.953,149; p =.035) with a moderate effect size (partial η2 = 0.056). The average difference on one-year cost after randomization was 2582€ favoring patients in the TaU + MIND group: such a figure is higher than the reimbursement from the Lombardia Region Health System for mindfulness-based sessions implementation (57€ per patient).
conclusionsThis study supports the cost-efficacy of adding six weekly group sessions of mindfulness practice to TaU for the treatment of CM-MOH.
trial registrationNCT03671681 (clinicaltrials.gov 13/09/2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40555938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.