Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555931›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2025

Effect of Opioid-Free Versus Opioid Anesthesia on the Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Receiving Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Bijia Song, Wenjing Li, Lei Wan, Ling Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bijia SongBeijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenjing LiBeijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lei WanBeijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ling ZhangOASIS International Hospital, Beijing, China. 630992254@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioids are commonly used in general anesthesia for pain management. However, they are related to obvious side effects. Patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are at higher risk of experiencing adverse effects associated with opioids. However, there is great heterogeneity in how to select and combine antinociceptive drugs to replace opioids. This randomized controlled double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the use effect of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on the quality of postoperative recovery.

methodsThis prospective, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled study included seventy-six patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients were randomly assigned to OFA group or opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) group. The primary outcome included the 15-item recovery quality scale (QOR-15). Secondary measures included intraoperative hemodynamic stability, intraoperative operation information, duration of until postoperative PACU Aldrete score > 9 points, anesthesia-related complication, and number of analgesic pump presses.

resultsThe scores of QOR-15 in OFA group were higher than that in OBA group at 24 h and 48 h after surgery. The total dose of propofol required in OFA group was statistically less than that in OBA group. Patients in the OBA group had significantly lower bispectral index (BIS) values and lower levels of MAP at T2 (after intubation) than those in the OFA group patients in the OBA group. Patients in the OFA group showed significantly lower levels of heart rate (HR) at T3 (after abdominal closure) when compared to the OBA group. The changing trend of visual analog scale (VAS) and OBAS scores recorded after surgery were similar between both groups and the VAS and Overall Benefit of Analgesia Scale (OBAS) scores in OBA group were obviously higher than those in OFA group in each time point. The Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting in OBA group were obviously higher than those in OFA group in each time point.

conclusionsOFA significantly improved postoperative recovery quality as evidenced by higher QOR-15 scores, reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), lower pain scores and decreased opioid requirements compared to OBA. Although duration of awakening from anesthesia was prolonged, OFA demonstrated superior recovery outcomes and fewer complications supporting its clinical utility in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, GeneralGastrectomyLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidPostoperative PainAdultAnesthesia Recovery PeriodDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyObesityOpioid-based anesthesiaOpioid-free anesthesiaPostoperative recovery

Identifiers

PMID40555931
PMCPMC12380946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.