Trial reportObesity surgery2025
Effect of Opioid-Free Versus Opioid Anesthesia on the Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Receiving Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opioid-free analgesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based analgesia after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Magnesium Sulfate as a Multimodal Anesthetic Adjuvant in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hemodynamic, Analgesic, and Biomarker Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- An Emerging Paradigm for Safer and Faster Recovery: A Narrative Review on Opioid Sparing Anesthesia in Surgery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Opioid-free anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery for gastrointestinal surgery: current status, challenges, and prospects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota, liver disease, and perioperative anesthesia: interactions, risks, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Effect of opioid-free versus opioid-based anaesthesia among surgical patients in public health care centers: A community medicine perspective.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpioids are commonly used in general anesthesia for pain management. However, they are related to obvious side effects. Patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are at higher risk of experiencing adverse effects associated with opioids. However, there is great heterogeneity in how to select and combine antinociceptive drugs to replace opioids. This randomized controlled double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the use effect of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on the quality of postoperative recovery.
methodsThis prospective, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled study included seventy-six patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients were randomly assigned to OFA group or opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) group. The primary outcome included the 15-item recovery quality scale (QOR-15). Secondary measures included intraoperative hemodynamic stability, intraoperative operation information, duration of until postoperative PACU Aldrete score > 9 points, anesthesia-related complication, and number of analgesic pump presses.
resultsThe scores of QOR-15 in OFA group were higher than that in OBA group at 24 h and 48 h after surgery. The total dose of propofol required in OFA group was statistically less than that in OBA group. Patients in the OBA group had significantly lower bispectral index (BIS) values and lower levels of MAP at T2 (after intubation) than those in the OFA group patients in the OBA group. Patients in the OFA group showed significantly lower levels of heart rate (HR) at T3 (after abdominal closure) when compared to the OBA group. The changing trend of visual analog scale (VAS) and OBAS scores recorded after surgery were similar between both groups and the VAS and Overall Benefit of Analgesia Scale (OBAS) scores in OBA group were obviously higher than those in OFA group in each time point. The Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting in OBA group were obviously higher than those in OFA group in each time point.
conclusionsOFA significantly improved postoperative recovery quality as evidenced by higher QOR-15 scores, reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), lower pain scores and decreased opioid requirements compared to OBA. Although duration of awakening from anesthesia was prolonged, OFA demonstrated superior recovery outcomes and fewer complications supporting its clinical utility in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.