Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555903›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Abstract words are hard to acquire; Does social relevance help?

Faris Mahmood, Emiko J Muraki, Veronica Diveica, Richard J Binney, Andrea B Protzner, Penny M Pexman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faris Mahmood *Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1333-1663
Emiko J Muraki *Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. ejmuraki@ucalgary.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-6538
Veronica DiveicaMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-8200
Richard J BinneySchool of Psychology and Sport Science, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-2922
Andrea B ProtznerDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8062-2923
Penny M PexmanDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7130-0973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of language and conceptual development have proposed that social relevance is helpful for understanding and acquiring the meanings of abstract words. However, there have been few direct tests of these relationships. In the present study, we used a newly quantified measure of word socialness, alongside word concreteness and valence ratings, to determine if children acquire more social abstract words earlier than less social abstract words. Our analysis included 4,047 words and examined the relationships among word socialness, valence, concreteness, and frequency in relation to age of acquisition ratings and, separately, test-based age of acquisition. We found that socialness significantly predicted age of acquisition, facilitating learning of abstract words more than concrete words. However, this greater benefit to abstract words was diminished when accounting for emotional valence. Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between socialness and valence, which suggests there may be subsets of highly social and emotional words that are earlier acquired, regardless of concreteness. Our findings highlight the importance of socialness in word learning and underscore the necessity for a more nuanced examination of social concept subtypes to fully understand its facilitatory role in abstract word acquisition.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLanguage DevelopmentVerbal LearningChildChild, PreschoolEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleAbstract language developmentCognitive developmentEmbodied cognitionLanguage acquisition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.