ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
New options and techniques in reconstructing the sacrum.
Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSacral tumours, both benign and malignant, often necessitate surgical removal (sacrectomy) to achieve optimal outcomes. However, this procedure disrupts the pelvic ring's stability, potentially leading to pain and limited mobility.
methodsThis article explores innovative approaches to reconstruct the sacrum and restore function in primary and secondary sacral tumours.
resultsBeyond traditional bone graft-based spino-pelvic fixation, the paper delves into minimally invasive alternatives like robotic-assisted surgery which may be used especially as a palliative procedure in destructive lumbosacral junction metastases. This technique offers enhanced precision for implant placement and often a reduced surgical exposure, potentially improving patient recovery. Additionally, the article discusses the application of 3D-printed custom implants, precisely matched the patient's anatomy to provide immediate structural support. It also explores the use of vascularised long bone flaps for pelvic reconstruction to achieve both stability and ambulation after sacrectomy. Additionally, it is necessary to mention the crucial role of soft tissue reconstruction using local flaps or free flaps from other body regions.
conclusionBy presenting these advancements in sacral reconstruction techniques, this article empowers surgeons to select an individualised approach for their patient. This personalised approach can optimise post-operative outcomes, allowing patients to regain function and improve their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40555867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.