ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Biochemical insight into gut microbial imbalance in Covid-19 and post vaccination heart attacks.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gut dysbiosis (GD) influences myocardial infarction (MI), by promoting inflammation. Investigating compositional shifts in proinflammatory versus beneficial bacterial taxa may reveal novel biomarkers and therapeutic interventions. This study analysed stool samples from 30 patients who experienced myocardial infarction following COVID-19 infection or vaccination, and 20 healthy controls, using 16S rRNA sequencing to investigate gut microbial imbalances. OTUs were identified, and microbial differences were examined via PCA and PLS-DA to explore biomarkers and interventions. MI patients exhibited reduced Prevotella (17.19% vs. 30% in controls) and elevated Escherichia (16.11% vs.0. 28%), Salmonella (2.58% vs. 0.08%), and Bacteroides (15.91% vs. 8.18%), indicating proinflammatory Microbiota. At phylum level, Firmicutes increased (45.80% vs. 40.87%), Proteobacteria rose (13.27% vs. 9.91%), and beneficial Actinobacteria declined (2.78% vs. 3.67%). PCA showed distinct clustering, confirmed by Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, highlighting heightened inflammation-driving taxa. Although Faecalibacterium appeared variably, it was overall diminished in MI patients, likely fueling immune activation. However, Bifidobacterium (2.06% vs. 2.57%) and Lactobacillus (0.63% v. 0.99%) decreased, compromising intestinal barrier integrity. Females had higher Fusobacterium (1.85% vs. ~ 0%) and Streptococcus (2.28% vs. 0.16%), whereas males exhibited increased Desulfovibrio (1.60% vs. 0.08%) and Akkermansia (1.02% vs. 0.04%). Finally, Enterobacteriaceae surged from 0.41% to 10.04%, exacerbating inflammatory cascades and underscoring dysbiosis in MI pathophysiology. Findings highlights pivotal role of dysbiosis in MI, with elevated proinflammatory bacteria (Escherichia, Salmonella, Proteobacteria) and reduced beneficial SCFA-producing taxa (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus) worsening inflammation. Sex-specific microbial alterations, characterized by an enrichment of Fusobacterium and Streptococcus in females and elevated levels of Desulfovibrio and Akkermansia in males, underscore their potential utility as clinical biomarkers for risk stratification. Targeted microbiota therapies can enhance cardiac care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40555851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.