ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025
Indirect reciprocal facilitation promotes species coexistence in plant communities worldwide.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biotic interactions biogeography: A framework for understanding how species interactions shape biodiversity patterns across scales.PLoS biology · 2026Review
- Indirect Interactions Driven by Soil Effects Enable Coexistence Among Competing Plant Species.Ecology letters · 2026Article
- Environmental complexity shapes maintenance of bacterial diversity through context-dependent interactions among niche axes.The ISME journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-plant facilitation is key to supporting species persistence within communities. However, as beneficiary species mature and compete with their benefactors, competition appears to dominate, suggesting that facilitation has a limited role in long-term community structuring. Here, we propose that facilitation can consistently enhance diversity when it occurs reciprocally between interacting species. Leveraging spatial associations between recruits and canopy species to infer recruiting interactions, we analyse a global dataset of 96 plant community recruitment networks, encompassing 2,403 non-transient populations across 23 countries. We show that ~90% of facilitation events were reciprocated, primarily mediated by intermediary species that transmit benefits through indirect facilitation loops, ultimately returning these benefits to the original benefactors. We find stronger positive effects within longer facilitation loops coupled with fewer negative interactions, which are essential conditions for benefactors to receive increased returns and, consequently, for the long-term persistence of indirect reciprocal facilitation. A positive empirical relationship between indirect reciprocity and species richness, substantiated by numerical simulations, indicates that these conditions also foster species coexistence. Our findings highlight the underappreciated role of indirect reciprocal facilitation in maintaining biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40555801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.