Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555793›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

Exploring coffee processing stages: Wet fermentation with and without Saccharomyces cerevisiae vs. Conventional process.

Ana Paula Pereira Bressani, Nádia Nara Batista, Débora Mara de Jesus Cassimiro, Simone da Fonseca Pires, Hélida Monteiro de Andrade, Disney Ribeiro Dias, Rosane Freitas Schwan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Paula Pereira BressaniDepartment of Food Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, CEP 37203-202, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-6144
Nádia Nara BatistaDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, CEP 37203-202, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-1820
Débora Mara de Jesus CassimiroDepartment of Food Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, CEP 37203-202, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-9994
Simone da Fonseca PiresTechnology in Coffee Growing and Agronomy Course, Federal Institute of Southeast Minas Gerais- IFSUDESTEMG, Manhuaçu, MG, CEP 36909-300, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-9243
Hélida Monteiro de AndradeDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-4530
Disney Ribeiro DiasDepartment of Food Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, CEP 37203-202, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1010-1484
Rosane Freitas SchwanDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, CEP 37203-202, Brazil. rschwan@ufla.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-8882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to perform a wet coffee fermentation process using self-induced anaerobic fermentation (SIAF), with or without a starter culture, and a subsequent pulping stage to verify the influence on the beverage's quality. The ripe fruits were fermented in water using the SIAF method, with and without inoculating S. cerevisiae CCMA 0543, and were compared to a Conventional process (direct drying on suspended terraces). Samples were collected at different times of fermentation and drying for analysis of yeast population (qPCR), carbohydrates and organic acids (HPLC), protein profile (2-D SDS-PAGE), and volatile compounds (GC-MS). Sensory analysis was performed by certified tasters (Q-Graders). The treatment with S. cerevisiae (SC) demonstrated greater efficiency in consuming glucose and fructose, resulting in the lowest concentrations of these sugars at the end of fermentation (1.30 and 2.64 g/Kg, respectively). This treatment also showed increased lactic acid (8.76 g/Kg) and reduced acetic acid (6.40 g/Kg). The Conventional process presented a higher acetic acid content (10.12 g/Kg). Proteomic analysis revealed a unique protein expression profile in the SC treatment. After fermentation, a higher abundance of esters, aldehydes, alcohols, and acids was identified in the inoculated treatment. After roasting, furans, pyrazines, and other volatile compounds were predominant in this coffee. This treatment was the only one classified as specialty coffee (score 85.00). The inoculation of S. cerevisiae using the SIAF method proved effective in enhancing the quality of wet coffee, producing consistent and high-quality beverages that meet specialty coffee standards.

Indexed as

CoffeeFermentationFood HandlingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAcetic AcidGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryProteomicsVolatile Organic CompoundsAcetic AcidCoffeeVolatile Organic CompoundsCoffee qualitySelf-induced anaerobic fermentation (SIAF)Specialty coffeeWet fermentationWhole fruit

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.