ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Exploring coffee processing stages: Wet fermentation with and without Saccharomyces cerevisiae vs. Conventional process.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Changes in Taste Characteristics of Coffee at Different Primary Processing Methods Using E-Tongue, Untargeted Metabolomics and WGCNA.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to perform a wet coffee fermentation process using self-induced anaerobic fermentation (SIAF), with or without a starter culture, and a subsequent pulping stage to verify the influence on the beverage's quality. The ripe fruits were fermented in water using the SIAF method, with and without inoculating S. cerevisiae CCMA 0543, and were compared to a Conventional process (direct drying on suspended terraces). Samples were collected at different times of fermentation and drying for analysis of yeast population (qPCR), carbohydrates and organic acids (HPLC), protein profile (2-D SDS-PAGE), and volatile compounds (GC-MS). Sensory analysis was performed by certified tasters (Q-Graders). The treatment with S. cerevisiae (SC) demonstrated greater efficiency in consuming glucose and fructose, resulting in the lowest concentrations of these sugars at the end of fermentation (1.30 and 2.64 g/Kg, respectively). This treatment also showed increased lactic acid (8.76 g/Kg) and reduced acetic acid (6.40 g/Kg). The Conventional process presented a higher acetic acid content (10.12 g/Kg). Proteomic analysis revealed a unique protein expression profile in the SC treatment. After fermentation, a higher abundance of esters, aldehydes, alcohols, and acids was identified in the inoculated treatment. After roasting, furans, pyrazines, and other volatile compounds were predominant in this coffee. This treatment was the only one classified as specialty coffee (score 85.00). The inoculation of S. cerevisiae using the SIAF method proved effective in enhancing the quality of wet coffee, producing consistent and high-quality beverages that meet specialty coffee standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40555793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.