Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555772›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025

Balancing Professional Commitments and Personal Life for Women in Interventional Radiology.

Georgia Tsoumakidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Georgia TsoumakidouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. Georgia.Tsoumakidou@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-7633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional Radiology (IR) is a captivating yet demanding specialty, characterized by its technical complexity, time-sensitive procedures, and intensive work environment. Women in IR face additional challenges, including underrepresentation, implicit bias, limited mentorship and the struggle to balance professional and personal responsibilities. The long, unpredictable working hours, the on call duties and the physical demands of the specialty further complicate work-life integration. This article explores key strategies to create a more inclusive and supportive environment, promoting sustainable careers and advancing gender equality in the field.

Indexed as

Physicians, WomenRadiology, InterventionalWork-Life BalanceCareer ChoiceFemaleHumansMentorsBurn out preventionGender equityInterventional radiologyMentorshipWork life balance

Identifiers

PMID40555772
PMCPMC12464143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.