ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Comparison of Same Versus Different Projection Implants in Asymmetric Tuberous Breasts: Long-Term Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Analysis.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe approach to addressing tuberous breast deformity has evolved significantly, with a wide array of procedures now available. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes using same or different projection implants in patients with asymmetry grade A or B and tuberous breast type I, II or III. MATERIAL AND
methodsEligible patients met the following criteria: (1) primary surgical procedure for correction of tuberous malformation; (2) breast asymmetry, (3) follow-up for at least 2 years; (4) standard pre- and postoperative photodocumentation; (5) proficiency in Italian language; and (6) signed consent for study participation. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team, using a singular or double superior glandular flap for the correction of the tuberous breast, using retroglandular round implants and circumareolar incision. All patients completed Italian versions of the BREAST-Q, which were issued by e-mail approximately 2 years postoperatively. We compared levels of patient satisfaction with the breast postoperative module by group, using the Chi-squared test for unpaired data. Two plastic surgeons reviewed all postoperative photographs of treated patients and rated outcomes on a VAS scale of 1-5.
resultsA total of 63 patients were enrolled, aged between 20 and 35 years. Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: group 1 (28 patients), same implants and gland resection of the bigger breast; group 2 (35 patients), same base and height but different projection and volume implant using the bigger and more projecting implant in the smaller breast. The BREAST-Q showed higher scores in group 2 in all the scales (psychosocial well-being p = 0.039; Sexual well-being p = 0.043; satisfaction with breasts p = 0.028; satisfaction with implants p = 0.014). The VAS scores were higher in groups 2 (p = 0.013), which was also the one undergoing fewer secondary procedures (lipofilling) compared to group 1 (p = 0.030).
conclusionsThis study is one of the few in the literature that highlights the importance of achieving good symmetry in tuberous breasts with different degrees of severity and different asymmetry, with greater predictability and without secondary procedures, and according to the data of this study, the use of prosthesis with different projection has better results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40555738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.