ArticleScientific reports2025
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of lorazepam based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical application of abdominal breathing training and evaluation of physical and mental benefits in anxiety patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lorazepam is extensively used to treat anxiety disorders and anxiety associated with depression. This study evaluates the safety of lorazepam based on real-world data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Data were collected from January 2004 to June 2024. After standardizing the data, we quantified signals using four algorithms, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and the Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to quantize the signal by Bayesian analysis and disproportionation analysis. AE signals were predominantly involved psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, injury, poisoning and procedural complications, and cardiac disorders. Notably, new potential AE signals of clinical value were identified in this study, including tachycardia, rhabdomyolysis, neologism, phagophobia, pancreatic fibrosis, and pneumonia. Sex-stratified analysis showed that the risk of poisoning was more pronounced in females and the AEs of sedation were more pronounced in males. Age-stratified analysis demonstrated variations in AEs across different age groups.The findings of this study were consistent with clinical trials, and identified several new potential AE signals. In addition, there are gender and age differences in some AEs. These findings provide valuable insights into lorazepam in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.