Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555730›Full record

SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2025

Comparative efficacy and safety of daridorexant, lemborexant, and suvorexant for insomnia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Taro Kishi, Toshikazu Ikuta, Leslie Citrome, Kenji Sakuma, Masakazu Hatano, Shun Hamanaka, Yasufumi Nishii, Nakao Iwata

Abstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Dual orexin receptor antagonist-assisted dose reduction of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists: a mirror-image analysis of insurance claims data.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Insomnia disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Taro KishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan. tarok@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-2236
Toshikazu IkutaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Applied Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-302X
Leslie CitromeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Siences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-9266
Kenji SakumaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Masakazu HatanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Shun HamanakaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yasufumi NishiiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Nakao IwataDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-6076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to appraise the risk-benefit balance of the three available dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs; daridorexant, lemborexant, and suvorexant) for the management of adults with insomnia, we conducted a systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis.

methodsIncluded were all published double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of these agents. Outcomes included subjective time to sleep onset at month 1 (sTSO, primary), subjective total sleep time at month 1 (sTST, co-primary), subjective wake after sleep onset at month 1, Insomnia Severity Index scores at month 1, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and the incidence of individual adverse events such as somnolence, dizziness, falls, headache, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory tract infection.

resultsThis meta-analysis included eight trials (5198 adults, average age = 56.33 years, 67.84% female). The treatment arms included daridorexant 25 mg/day (DAR25), daridorexant 50 mg/day (DAR50), lemborexant 5 mg/day (LEM5), lemborexant 10 mg/day (LEM10), suvorexant 20 mg/day (15 mg/day for people ≥65years, SUV20/15), and placebo. All active-treatments outperformed placebo in terms of all efficacy outcomes. The standardized mean difference (95% CI) in primary outcomes ranged from; sTSO: -0.430 (-0.568, -0.292) for LEM10 to -0.164 (-0.296, -0.031) for SUV20/15 and sTST: -0.475 (-0.593, -0.357) for DRA50 to -0.206 ( -0.330, -0.082) for LEM5. An additional sensitivity analysis suggested that DRA25, LEM10, and SUV20/15 were associated with a higher incidence of somnolence compared to a placebo.

conclusionsConsidering that there is no evidence that DORAs are associated with physiological tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, or rebound insomnia when abruptly discontinued, and that sleep architecture is not adversely affected, the DORAs appear to be a favorable choice in managing insomnia disorder in adults.

Indexed as

AzepinesOrexin Receptor AntagonistsPyridinesPyrimidinesPyrrolidinesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTriazolesHumansImidazolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAzepinesdaridorexantImidazoleslemborexantOrexin Receptor AntagonistsPyridinesPyrimidinesPyrrolidinessuvorexantTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID40555730
PMCPMC12187915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.