ArticleNature communications2025
In vivo self-renewal and expansion of quiescent stem cells from a non-human primate.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stem cells from Cerdocyon thous: in vitro characterization and therapeutic potential.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- A who's who of cell types in skeletal muscle.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Polyamines, cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and mitochondrial function in older patients with coronary artery disease.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- The dynamics of centromere assembly and disassembly during quiescence.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Article
- High-Throughput Strategies for Streamlining Lipid Nanoparticle Development Pipeline.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- The dynamics of centromere assembly and disassembly during quiescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Turning back time in the testes.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of non-human primate models is essential for the fields of developmental and regenerative biology because those models will more closely approximate human biology than do murine models. Based on single cell RNAseq and fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we report the identification and functional characterization of two quiescent stem cell populations (skeletal muscle stem cells (MuSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells termed fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs)) in the non-human primate Microcebus murinus (the gray mouse lemur). We demonstrate in vivo proliferation, differentiation, and self-renewal of both MuSCs and FAPs. By combining cell phenotyping with cross-species molecular profiling and pharmacological interventions, we show that mouse lemur MuSCs and FAPs are more similar to human than to mouse counterparts. We identify unexpected gene targets involved in regulating primate MuSC proliferation and primate FAP adipogenic differentiation. Moreover, we find that the cellular composition of mouse lemur muscle better models human muscle than does macaque (Macaca fascicularis) muscle. Finally, we note that our approach presents as a generalizable pipeline for the identification, isolation, and characterization of stem cell populations in new animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.