Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555729›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

In vivo self-renewal and expansion of quiescent stem cells from a non-human primate.

Jengmin Kang, Abhijnya Kanugovi, M Pilar J Stella, Zofija Frimand, Jean Farup, Andoni Urtasun, Shixuan Liu, Anne-Sofie Clausen, Heather Ishak, Summer Bui and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A who's who of cell types in skeletal muscle.Communications biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-Throughput Strategies for Streamlining Lipid Nanoparticle Development Pipeline.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. The dynamics of centromere assembly and disassembly during quiescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Turning back time in the testes.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jengmin Kang *Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-3070
Abhijnya Kanugovi *Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
M Pilar J Stella *Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-4428
Zofija FrimandDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-514X
Jean FarupDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Andoni UrtasunDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shixuan LiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-415X
Anne-Sofie ClausenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0201-7273
Heather IshakDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Summer BuiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Soochi KimDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Camille EzranDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-4847
Olga BotvinnikChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ermelinda PorpigliaDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-899X
Mark A KrasnowDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1976-5471
Antoine de MorreeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. demorree@biomed.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-4531
Thomas A RandoDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. trando@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-8564

Funding

Wnt signaling in muscle stem cell agingP01AG036695 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARGARET A. GOODELL · 2011 to 2026
$29.3M
Aging and Stem Cell ResilienceR01AG068667 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RANDO, THOMAS A. · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Molecular Regulation of Stem Cell QuiescenceR01AR073248 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RANDO, THOMAS A. · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond (Aarhus University Research Foundation) AUFF-E-2022-9-28NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073248NIA NIH HHS P01 AG036695NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068667Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) 0071116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of non-human primate models is essential for the fields of developmental and regenerative biology because those models will more closely approximate human biology than do murine models. Based on single cell RNAseq and fluorescence-activated cell sorting, we report the identification and functional characterization of two quiescent stem cell populations (skeletal muscle stem cells (MuSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells termed fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs)) in the non-human primate Microcebus murinus (the gray mouse lemur). We demonstrate in vivo proliferation, differentiation, and self-renewal of both MuSCs and FAPs. By combining cell phenotyping with cross-species molecular profiling and pharmacological interventions, we show that mouse lemur MuSCs and FAPs are more similar to human than to mouse counterparts. We identify unexpected gene targets involved in regulating primate MuSC proliferation and primate FAP adipogenic differentiation. Moreover, we find that the cellular composition of mouse lemur muscle better models human muscle than does macaque (Macaca fascicularis) muscle. Finally, we note that our approach presents as a generalizable pipeline for the identification, isolation, and characterization of stem cell populations in new animal models.

Indexed as

Cell Self RenewalMesenchymal Stem CellsMuscle, SkeletalStem CellsAdipogenesisAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCheirogaleidaeHumansMacaca fascicularisMaleMice

Identifiers

PMID40555729
PMCPMC12187938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.