ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Adverse reactions following first three doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: A prospective cohort study on relationships with individual characteristics and previous experience of adverse reactions.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A clear consensus on the factors contributing to adverse reactions following the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine has yet to be reached. Therefore, the present study investigated adverse reactions following the first three doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and examined associated factors, including previous experience of adverse reactions. Two prospective cohort studies were integrated for this study, and 218 participants (79% female; median age 46.5 years) who had completed all three doses of BNT162b2 were included in the final analyses. Data were collected through self-administered electronic questionnaires. Local and systemic adverse reactions following vaccinations were classified with severity grading. Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the association of adverse reactions. Local reactions were reported by 91-96% of participants, with moderate or severe local reactions in 27-43%. Systemic reactions were reported by 56-88% of participants, with moderate or severe systemic reactions in 19-56%. Participants with a history of moderate or severe local reactions were more likely to subsequently have moderate or severe local reactions (relative risk: 2.32 [95% confidence interval: 1.52-3.55] for the second dose, 1.89 [1.33-2.69] for the third dose), but not systemic reactions. Participants with a history of moderate or severe systemic reactions were more likely to subsequently have moderate or severe systemic reactions (1.31 [0.99-1.72] for the second dose, 2.18 [1.56-3.06] for the third dose), but not local reactions. These results may contribute to a more detailed understanding of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and provide information for future vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.