ArticleBMJ open2025
Development of core competency evaluation index system for informatics nurses in China: a Delphi study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BOPPPS-based teaching combined with narrative pedagogy and curriculum ideology and politics in clinical nursing in gastrointestinal surgery: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the quiet quitting behavior scale: a mixed-methods study with primary healthcare workers in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a scientific and systematic core competency evaluation index system for informatics nurses in China. The goal is to support their training, assessment and performance evaluation.
methodsAn initial set of evaluation indicators was created based on a review of existing literature and semi-structured interviews. From September to December 2023, the indicators were refined through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. A total of 21 experts from 11 provinces in China completed the questionnaires.
resultsThe response rate for both rounds of questionnaire surveys was 100.0%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.934. The coordination coefficient among experts was statistically significant (p<0.05). After analysing expert feedback, the final index system included six first-, 17 second- and 69 third-level indicators. Each indicator was assigned a weight. The six first-level indicators and their weights were as follows: theoretical and practical skills (0.303), communication and coordination skills (0.152), professional development capabilities (0.210), critical thinking (0.050), nursing management skills (0.210) and occupational humanistic characteristics (0.075).
conclusionsThis core competency evaluation index system provides a foundation for the training and assessment of informatics nurses in China. It can help develop skilled informatics nurses who improve care processes, enhance efficiency and support better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.