ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
The diversity of biological models for bio-inspired aerosol filters.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface-Engineered Filters for Wettability-Driven Collection of Airborne Fungal Spores.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Article
- Constraints on lunge feeding: krill can clog the baleen of filter-feeding whales.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- The diversity of biological models for bio-inspired aerosol filters.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Innovative filtration systems are essential to enhance air quality or improve aerosol sampling for analysis, while addressing challenges such as high energy consumption, clogging and inefficiencies in capturing a wide range of particle diameters. Bio-inspiration provides novel design strategies by translating natural particle separation mechanisms (PSMs) into more efficient, adaptive and sustainable filtration technologies. This review systematically identifies six organismic groups as biological models that use distinct particle capture mechanisms to retain airborne particles for nutrition, reproduction and protection. Filtration-based PSMs in air, such as insect spiracles, hornet silk caps and spider webs, employ dead-end filtration with varying mesh structures to either purify air or capture prey. Non-filtration PSMs, including nasal cavities and wind pollination, rely on passive aerodynamic mechanisms such as impaction, interception and settling for particle retention. Flow regime control is crucial for non-filtration PSMs, where structures like nasal turbinates and pine cone surfaces optimize local airflows. Adhesive mechanisms, found in spider webs and nasal mucus, improve particle attachment. By mapping these principles to aerosol filtration challenges-such as particle adhesion, flow optimization and efficient removal of submicrometre particles-this review identifies promising pathways for bio-inspired aerosol filters in environmental monitoring, industrial hygiene and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.