Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40555364›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Integration of postnatal craniofacial development and the effects of diet consistency in rodents.

Morgane Dubied, Sophie Montuire, Nicolas Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Morgane DubiedBiogéosciences, UMR CNRS/EPHE 6282, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon 21000, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9304-2714
Sophie MontuireBiogéosciences, UMR CNRS/EPHE 6282, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon 21000, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5341-5344
Nicolas NavarroBiogéosciences, UMR CNRS/EPHE 6282, Université Bourgogne Europe, Dijon 21000, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5694-4201

Funding

Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic covariances between traits, shaped by developmental processes and functional integration, play a critical role in the response to natural selection. The influences of environmental factors (e.g. food availability and consistency) on these covariances might be particularly prevalent when functional and anatomical complexes develop. In this study, we investigate the ontogenetic development and plasticity of the craniofacial complex, focusing on the integration between skull and mandible in three rodent species: house mouse, golden hamster and Mongolian gerbil. By raising these species from birth then, post-weaning and until 63 days old, on hard and soft diets, we assess how diet-induced biomechanical stress influences coordinated changes in craniofacial shape. Using geometric morphometrics, we identify conserved ontogenetic integration patterns in craniofacial development, with species-specific differences in timing and spatial dynamics of shape changes. We demonstrate that post-weaning dietary variation modulates the coordination between skull and mandible development. Our results emphasize the role of mechanical stress in shaping craniofacial morphology, suggesting that plastic mechanisms can serve as an adaptative and evolutionary lever to respond to food availability while preserving a functional craniofacial complex. Moreover, these mechanisms may play a role in integrating complex signals of divergence between evolutionary pools in the craniofacial complex.

Indexed as

DietGerbillinaeMandibleMesocricetusSkullAnimalsCricetinaeMaleMiceSpecies Specificitycovariationdevelopmentdietgeometric morphometricsintegrationontogenyplasticitypostnatalrodentsskull

Identifiers

PMID40555364
PMCPMC12187425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.