ReviewCurrent biology : CB2025
The cellular substrate of evolutionary novelty.
Review in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unicellular and Multicellular Modes of Selection Impose Distinct Constraints on Cellular Phenotype Evolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AScience signaling · 2026Article
- Decoding cnidarian cell type gene regulation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- A simple model reveals why complex evolutionary innovations follow predictable paths.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in biology is comprehending how complex multicellular novelties evolve. Central to this problem is explaining how qualitatively new phenotypic traits - typically the focus of comparative developmental and macroevolutionary studies above the species level - can become established through population genetic processes. Here, we suggest that a resolution may be found by acknowledging the fundamental entities from which functional organismal phenotypes are constructed. We argue that these are not genes, proteins or cell types, but rather gene expression programs (GEPs): sets of co-expressed transcripts that collectively encode cellular subfunctions. We advance that, because GEPs are the smallest, elemental functional units underlying phenotypes, it follows that they represent the substrate upon which population genetic processes must act to explain the origin of evolutionary novelty at the cellular level and above. Novelty arises through the evolution of novel GEPs, through novel synergisms between GEPs that become co-expressed within the same cell or through interactions between different GEPs juxtaposed in cooperating cells within organs. The revolution in single cell biology offers the chance to trace evolution at the resolution of GEPs in populations and across clades, potentially unifying our view of multicellular phenotypic evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.