SynthesisWomen's health (London, England)
The influence of rurality on women's decision making and pregnancy choices following an unintended pregnancy: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Politicization on Adolescent Medicine Care: A Rapid Review.Current pediatrics reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Almost half of all pregnancies worldwide and 34% of pregnancies in high-income countries are considered unintended. Several studies from high-income countries report that women from rural areas are more likely to continue their unintended pregnancy and give birth, while urban women are more likely to have an induced abortion. To explore how rurality influences women's decision making and pregnancy choices following unintended pregnancy by examining the global trends for women who reside in rural areas of high-income countries. This study is a systematic review of qualitative, cross-sectional and mixed-methods studies. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature, published from January 2000 through to March 2024, retrieved from five databases: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PubMed. Restrictions were applied to obtain original research that has been undertaken in high-income countries. The review included studies featuring participants that were either rural women who experience an unintended pregnancy or health care professionals providing direct care to rural women. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Several factors that influenced rural women's decision making following an unintended pregnancy were identified: access to abortion services; role of health care professionals; temporal factors; social norms and stigma; social factors and determinants; culture, ethnicity and religion; reproductive coercion and abortion legislation. The Social-Ecological Model highlighted the levels of interaction, the role health care professionals, family members and the wider community in supporting or obstructing rural women's decision making. Rural women's pregnancy decision making and reproductive autonomy can be compromised by intimate partners, family members, health professionals and rural culture. Health professionals have a pivotal role in supporting and respecting rural women's decision making when seeking an abortion and ensuring that rural women have timely access to abortion care. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42023409917.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.