ArticlePloS one2025
Low-salinity medium for large-scale biomass production of the marine purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marine purple non-sulfur bacteria such as Rhodovulum sulfidophilum are versatile due to their diverse applications in bioremediation, biotechnological production of useful materials, industrial production of value-added compounds, and agricultural fertilizers. Our previous study demonstrated the potential of its lysed and dried biomass as a nitrogen fertilizer for plant production. However, large-scale fertilizer production requires scaling up the culture to larger volumes, which is not cost-effective with currently available options for growth media. In this study, we tested a seawater-based, cost-effective alternative to the commonly used nutrient-rich culture medium for the growth of this bacterium. We found that reducing salinity from 3% to 1.2% had no adverse effects on its heterotrophic growth, dry cell yield, nitrogen content, and total amino acid composition. The nitrogen content and the weight percent of free lysine, aspartic acid, and glutamate tended to increase in the biomass obtained from cultures grown at 1.2% salinity. Under autotrophic conditions, decreasing salinity to 1.2% did not affect cell growth, final dry cell yields, and total carbon assimilation, but N assimilation remained higher. Reducing salinity to 1.2% proved to be cost-effective and feasible for the cultivation of R. sulfidophilum without increasing the risk of contamination, providing a viable alternative for its large-scale cultivation and application as a plant nitrogen fertilizer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.