Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40554597›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Selection for florfenicol resistance at sub-MIC concentrations in Pasteurella multocida.

Abigail Hughes, Ludovic Pelligand, Dan I Andersson, Andrew Mead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abigail HughesComparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0002-3641-7070
Ludovic PelligandComparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Dan I AnderssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Andrew MeadComparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-3030

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat to both human and animal health, and transfer of resistance between these spheres is recognised as a key concern for all species. Selection for resistance at sub-inhibitory antimicrobial concentrations has been characterised for some bacteria-antimicrobial combinations but there is little data from non-laboratory strains, and veterinary antimicrobials and bacterial species. Here, we demonstrate a minimum selective concentration of 0.06 mg/L (1/6 xMIC) for florfenicol in wild-type Pasteurella multocida, through competition experiments between a susceptible strain and a floR-resistant mutant. We also show that sub-inhibitory concentrations of florfenicol do not appear to significantly select for de novo resistance in P. multocida and present the challenges with adapting experimental protocols between bacterial species. These results have important implications for antimicrobial resistance selection at sub-inhibitory concentrations, method development for within-species differentiation in novel bacterial species, and application to policy regarding antimicrobial contamination in animal-feed.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialPasteurella multocidaThiamphenicolAnimalsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsflorfenicolThiamphenicol

Identifiers

PMID40554597
PMCPMC12186936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.