ArticleGenetics2025
How recombination and clonal evolution shape bacterial lineages and genomes.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parallel evolution of chimeric genes in microbial evolution experiments.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Heterogeneous Resistance Profiles and Selected Mobile Genetic Elements in Ecuadorian ClinicalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nearly a century of discoveries in bacterial genetics and their continuing impact on the field.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Nearly a century of discoveries in bacterial genetics and their continuing impact on the field.Genetics · 2025Article
- Convergent genomic responses of human gut bacteria to variations in industrialization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Homologous recombination is a key process in bacterial genome evolution. By analyzing sequencing collections of 12 bacterial species encompassing >100,000 genomes, we determine how recombination and clonal evolution shape bacterial lineages and genome structures. Previous analyses proposed that for some bacterial species recombination is so dominant that almost no clonal genomic fraction remains. Further, it has been suggested that bacterial phylogenies are entirely structured by scale-free distributions of recombination rates, based on measurement of private SNP distributions that exhibit power-law tails. Using a coalescent model of populations that recombine with different gene pools, we find a substantial clonal signal in all global bacterial populations analyzed, and infer recombination rates that typically vary by less than an order of magnitude within species. Additionally, for a local population of Escherichia coli isolates that exhibit power-law private SNP distributions, we infer narrowly-distributed recombination rates and a substantial clonal signal, and show that their clonal genealogy exhibits a distribution of coalescence times spanning several orders of magnitude. Using simulations and theory, we demonstrate that power-law SNP distributions are not indicative of widely-varying recombination rates and can be generated by a clonal genealogy recombining with an external pool at a constant rate. We use regression analysis to quantify the relative impact of recombination and clonal evolution on the diversity and lineage structure of local and global populations. Our findings have implications for how bacterial phylogeny is interpreted and lays key groundwork for understanding which evolutionary forces determine species diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.