ArticlePloS one2025
Marine sentinels using eDNA to track Physalia sp. in the Gulf of Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physalia sp. is among the world's most hazardous marine species, posing a significant threat to public safety and Thailand's tourism sector. Traditional survey methods such as trawling and netting are time-consuming, potentially disruptive to marine ecosystems, and often lack the precision needed for effective monitoring. This study employed environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis to investigate the distribution of Physalia sp. across 45 sampling sites in eight provinces along the Gulf of Thailand. Using species-specific primers and probes targeting the COI region, we successfully detected Physalia sp. eDNA in four provinces: Chonburi, Rayong, Chumphon, and Songkhla. Notably, high eDNA concentrations were observed in Songkhla province, correlating with direct beach observations and public health warnings. The detection in Chumphon province represents a previously undocumented distribution area for this species in Thailand. Bayesian occupancy modeling revealed moderate true-positive detection rates for field samples (θ11 = 0.627) and high rates for qPCR replicates (p11 = 0.9), with notably low false-positive probabilities (θ10 = 0.008, p10 = 0.01), demonstrating the reliability of our eDNA-based approach. These findings demonstrate the utility of eDNA technology as a non-invasive, sensitive tool for monitoring hazardous marine species, with important implications for public safety and marine ecosystem management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.