ArticlePloS one2025
Selection and appointment of presidents of medical universities in Iran: Bridging reality and ideal through global and local evidence.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing evaluation index system for "new medicine" construction in Chinese medical schools-meta-ethnography and Delphi-AHP approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe selection of university presidents who oversee health systems within their respective provinces has become increasingly critical in Iran, subjecting to an ongoing scrutiny and debate. This study aims to clarify the selection process and identify the essential competencies required for appointing medical university presidents both in Iran and globally, while also proposing relevant policy recommendations.
methodsThis study employed a multi-method approach, incorporating a scoping review, document review, interviews, and brainstorming. The scoping review, conducted in September 2024, searching databases including PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus. Interviews conducted from September 2024 to November 2024, were carried out with stakeholders from a diverse range, including university presidents, health ministers, healthcare managers, decision-makers, faculty members and key planners within the academic sector, whom were selected using purposive sampling method with maximum variation. A question guide was used, the main question of which included: essential characteristics and competencies of university president, prioritized criteria for decision making, feasibility of evidence-based decision-making, the process of selecting and appointing university presidents, and the strengths and weaknesses of this process. The data were analyzed using a framework analysis approach, informed by Modified Henry Mintzberg's Management Model and a model of policy competency. Documents related to the selection and appointment of medical university presidents, including rules, regulations, and circulars, were collected through a census approach using both manual and electronic methods. Relevant documents were systematically retrieved from the official websites of the involved organizations. Brainstorming conducted in December 2024 and was used to develop policy recommendations.
resultsTwenty six articles and 19 university protocols were included in the scoping review phase. Forty-two participants included in the qualitative phase of this study, most of who were president of a university. Also, 12 participants involved in the brainstorming phase. The responsibilities of a university president necessitating a blend of personal, interpersonal, professional and decisional competencies. In Iran, various factors including political preferences, lack of transparency and accountability, limited involvement from the university community, and insufficient emphasis on professional or technical competencies, influence the selection process of university presidents. The influence of some pressure groups including parliament representatives and the prevailing ideological climate within the Ministry of Health have varied across different governments, relegating essential professional competencies, such as the scientific credibility of the president, to low priority.
conclusionsDuring various selection and appointment periods, political changes and pressure groups' interests have had a significant impact on the management changes in universities, and with governments' changes, managerial capabilities are overshadowed by political tendencies. This study's findings underscore the importance of transparency, evidence-based decision-making, and a systematic approach to the selection and appointment of presidents of medical universities. Implementing these insights can enhance the integrity of the selection process and improve governance in medical education in Iran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.