ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Mother and newborn skin to skin contact in East Africa: Prevalence and predictors (2019-2023).
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in impaired physical function in older adults and the influences of physical activity: a population-based cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Individual and community-level determinants of skin-to-skin contact in Somaliland: a multilevel analysis of the 2020 demographic and health survey data.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Multilevel Determinants of Mother-Infant Skin-to-Skin Contact at Birth in Somalia: Findings from Somali Demographic and Health Survey.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between newborns and mothers is crucial for reducing hypothermia complications and enhancing mother-baby bonding. This study aimed to examine the prevalence rates and risk factors for SSC in five East African countries. Data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys covering five East African countries from 2019 to 2023 were utilized for secondary data analysis. A total of 37,140 newborns were included in the weighted sample sizes. The factors contributing to SSC prevalence were assessed using a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model, with significance declared at p-values <0.05. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and confidence intervals (CI) were used for interpretation. In East Africa, nearly half of newborns did not receive SSC. Individual-level factors associated with SSC included: immediate breastfeeding (IBF) (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI: (1.86, 2.69)), primary education (AOR = 1.60, 95% CI: (1.24, 2.07)), more than four antenatal care visits (AOR = 2.15, 95% CI: (1.37, 3.36)), low birth weight (AOR = 1.35, 95% CI: (1.04, 1.76)), multiple births (AOR = 0.41, 95% CI: (0.24, 0.73)), and cesarean section deliveries (AOR = 0.26, 95% CI: (0.20, 0.34)). Community-level factors included rural residence (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI: (0.48, 0.82)), with significant country-level variations: Kenya (AOR = 2.45, 95% CI: (1.72, 3.49)), Mozambique (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI: (0.91, 1.62)), and Tanzania (AOR = 3.14, 95% CI: (2.29, 4.31)). The findings indicate a low prevalence of mother-newborn SSC in East African countries, with particularly high rates observed in Rwanda and lower rates in Madagascar. Policymakers and ministries of health should prioritize initiatives aimed at improving SSC, particularly for newborns and mothers with low educational levels, limited media exposure, and those living in rural areas, to enhance maternal and neonatal care during delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.