ArticlePloS one2025
Ability to control forehand groundstroke of skilled tennis players.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of player heart rate and stroke success in tennis drill scenarios.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In tennis, the ability to hit groundstrokes accurately to a target area on the court is important. It is a common belief in tennis coaching that greater concentration leads to more accurate targeting. The purpose of this study was to test this belief by evaluating the variability of the ball-landing position when hitting toward target areas of different sizes and locations. Ten male top-level college tennis players performed forehand strokes and aimed at four target areas: 1) a short area (Short) between the service line and baselines, and 2) a deep area (Deep) just inside the baseline, both with an identical target size (2*2 m); and 3) a large area (Big, 2*4 m), and 4) a small area (Small, 1*1m), both centered in the same location. The average ball-landing position, standard deviation (SD), and bivariate variable error (BVE) were calculated. SD and BVE were normalized relative to the distance between the player and center of the target area. SD in the depth direction (net-baseline direction) was significantly smaller in Short than Deep, but the normalized SDs showed no difference. SD in Big was not significantly different from that in Small, suggesting that it is inherently difficult even for advanced tennis players to intentionally control the distribution of their ball-landing positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.