ArticlePloS one2025
Genetic profiling of inherited colorectal cancer syndromes in Tunisian patients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic investigation of a Tunisian family with Lynch syndrome: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, with 2% to 5% of cases being linked to inherited syndromes. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cohort of 30 Tunisian patients was selected and divided into two groups based on clinical features and family history: Group 1 included patients clinically diagnosed with hereditary polyposis syndromes, including MUTYH-Associated Polyposis (MAP: 15 cases) and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP: 5 cases). Group 2 consisted of patients clinically diagnosed with non-polyposis syndromes, including Lynch Syndrome (LS: 7 cases) and other rare syndromes (OS: 3 cases). Genetic testing was performed using either Sanger sequencing or targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a cancer panel including 31 cancer-related genes.
resultsIn Group 1, MAP was confirmed in 13 patients who were homozygous carriers of the pathogenic variant (c.1143_1144dup p.Glu382fs) in the MUTYH gene. For patients suspected of having FAP, pathogenic variants in the APC gene were identified in only two patients (c.3183_3187del p.Lys1061_Gln1062insTer, and c.2016_2017del p.His672Ter), while another patient carried a frameshift variant (c.502_503del, p.Ile168SerTer11) in the PTEN gene, indicating Cowden Syndrome. In Group 2, genetic testing confirmed Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome in a young girl who had a large deletion in the STK11 gene. For patients suspected to have LS, only variants of unknown significance (VUS) were identified in MMR. Further genetic investigations are required to identify the pathogenic variant in these patients.
conclusionOverall, our results highlight the importance of genetic testing to better understand hereditary CRC syndromes in Tunisian families, and to improve the management of patients and their relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.