ArticleBlood advances2025
A mixed methods study to understand the role of knowledge in transition among youth with sickle cell disease.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractDisease and management knowledge is crucial for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) transitioning from a pediatric to adult health care facility. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding the specific education needed and its association with an individual's ability to successfully transition. This study aims to explore the association between SCD-specific transition readiness assessment scores, patient characteristics, and the perceived importance and confidence in the individual's ability to manage their health and transition to an adult doctor. Semistructured interviews provided insights on education gaps and preferences. Eighty-four individuals completed the transition readiness assessment. Younger patients (aged ≤18 years) had significantly lower scores on the appointment (1.1 [standard deviation (SD), 0.7] vs 1.6 [SD, 0.6]; P = .007) and insurance (0.5 [SD, 0.7] vs 1.5 [SD, 1.1]; P = .0006) domains as compared with older (aged >18 years) individuals. Those who were very confident in their ability to manage their health care had significantly higher scores in disease knowledge (2.4 [SD, 0.5] vs 2.0 [SD, 0.7]; P = .01), medication management (2.5 [SD, 0.6] vs 2.1 [SD, 0.4]; P = .0001), appointments (1.4 [SD, 0.7] vs 0.9 [SD, 0.5]; P = .0006), and insurance (0.9 [SD, 0.9] vs 0.5 [SD, 0.8]; P = .02), compared with those who were not. Semistructured interviews with 9 young adults revealed a preference for transition education to start in their midteens, at least twice a year, and using a combination of approaches. Additional themes identified included the desire for ongoing education, familiarity with the workflow and environment, access to care, and the importance of support systems during their transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.