ArticleBlood advances2025
Long-term outcomes of patients with refractory cytopenia of childhood under observation only.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Study of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) in Childhood
Prospective Non-randomized Multi-center Study for Epidemiology and Characterization of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leucemia (JMML) in Childhood
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decitabine monotherapy for pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractRefractory cytopenia of childhood (RCC) describes an entity of well-recognized bone marrow failure defined by persistent cytopenia, dysplastic changes, and a unique histopathological pattern in the bone marrow. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is generally indicated for patients with severe cytopenia or abnormal karyotype, a subset of patients with RCC may be candidates for an observational approach. We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients with RCC without evidence of a genetic predisposition who had a normal karyotype and had not received HSCT or immunosuppressive therapy within 2 years from diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis of the 100 patients analyzed was 10.9 years (range 1.4-17.3); 84% presented with a hypocellular bone marrow. Clonal evolution with abnormal karyotype occurred in 3 patients (3%), and 1 case progressed to myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts. Three patients (3%) developed paroxysmal nocturnal hematuria. Overall, 9 patients (9%) received HSCT, and the 5- and 10-year HSCT-free survival was 94% and 88%, respectively. At last follow-up, all patients were alive with a median follow-up time of 7.2 years. These results indicate that an observational approach is safe for selected patients with RCC with a normal karyotype after an exclusion of a germ line predisposition syndrome. However, persistence of cytopenia in most of these patients underscores the importance of long-term surveillance and transition to adult hematology care. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00047268 and #NCT00662090.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.