ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2025
Magnetic bead-based electrochemical surrogate virus neutralization test for quantification of antibody neutralizing efficiency.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and inexpensive quantification of antibody neutralizing efficiency is currently limited due to the use of live virus and strict biosafety level requirements necessary to perform a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), severely restricting efficient evaluation of vaccine efficacy, establishment of correlates of protection, and determination of individual immune status for many viral diseases. Based on the surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), we demonstrate a magnetic bead-based electrochemical sVNT (esVNT) for sensitive quantification of SARS-CoV-2 antibody neutralization efficiency in under 15 min using a portable potentiostat. By utilizing magnetic beads as a solid phase for the capture probe and chronoamperometric detection, we show increased capture efficiency of reagents, minimal washing steps, and rapid signal generation without sacrificing sensitivity. The esVNT yields accurate quantification of neutralization efficiency for both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, even in the presence of potential interferents, as verified by comparison to sVNT. Spiked control serum and serum samples from a biorepository were evaluated, showing minimal matrix effects and the expected neutralization efficiency trends versus disease severity for esVNT compared to PRNT. Trends in PRNT and esVNT responses resulting from clonality, affinity, and neutralization mechanisms are also examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.