ArticleNeural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society2025
A connectomics-driven analysis reveals novel characterization of border regions in mouse visual cortex.
Article in Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leveraging retinotopic maps to parcellate the visual cortex into its respective sub-regions has long been a canonical approach to characterizing the functional organization of visual areas in the mouse brain. However, with the advent of extensive connectomics datasets like MICrONS, we can now perform more granular analyses to better characterize the structure and function of the visual cortex. In this work, we propose a statistical framework for analyzing the MICrONS dataset, particularly the V1, RL, and AL visual areas. In addition to identifying several structural and functional differences between these regions, we focus on the borders between these regions. By comparing the V1-RL and RL-AL border regions, we show that different boundaries between visual regions are distinct in their structure and function. Additionally, we find that the V1-RL border region has greater synaptic connectivity and more synchronous neural activity than the V1 and RL regions individually. We further analyze structure and function in tandem by measuring information flow along synapses, observing that the V1-RL border appears to act as a bridge between the V1 and RL visual areas. Overall, we identify numerous measures that distinguish the V1-RL border from the larger V1-RL network, potentially motivating its characterization as a distinct region in the mouse visual cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.