Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40554033›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2025

Aphasia severity prediction using a multi-modal machine learning approach.

Xinyi Hu, Maria Varkanitsa, Emerson Kropp, Margrit Betke, Prakash Ishwar, Swathi Kiran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acute-Phase Machine Learning Prediction of 12-Month Aphasia and Discourse Recovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyi HuBoston University, Data Science and Computing, Boston, 02215, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: xhu07@bu.edu.
Maria VarkanitsaBoston University, Center for Brain Recovery, Boston, 02215, MA, United States of America.
Emerson KroppBoston University, Center for Brain Recovery, Boston, 02215, MA, United States of America.
Margrit BetkeBoston University, Department of Computer Science, Boston, 02215, MA, United States of America.
Prakash IshwarBoston University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston, 02215, MA, United States of America.
Swathi KiranBoston University, Center for Brain Recovery, Boston, 02215, MA, United States of America.

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined an integrated multiple neuroimaging modality (T1 structural, Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), and resting-state FMRI (rsFMRI)) to predict aphasia severity using Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) in 76 individuals with post-stroke aphasia. We employed Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest (RF) models with supervised feature selection and a stacked feature prediction approach. The SVR model outperformed RF, achieving an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 16.38±5.57, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of 0.70±0.13, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 12.67±3.27, compared to RF's RMSE of 18.41±4.34, r of 0.66±0.15, and MAE of 14.64±3.04. Resting-state neural activity and structural integrity emerged as crucial predictors of aphasia severity, appearing in the top 20% of predictor combinations for both SVR and RF. Finally, the feature selection method revealed that functional connectivity in both hemispheres and between homologous language areas is critical for predicting language outcomes in patients with aphasia. The statistically significant difference in performance between the model using only single modality and the optimal multi-modal SVR/RF model (which included both resting-state connectivity and structural information) underscores that aphasia severity is influenced by factors beyond lesion location and volume. These findings suggest that integrating multiple neuroimaging modalities enhances the prediction of language outcomes in aphasia beyond lesion characteristics alone, offering insights that could inform personalized rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

AphasiaBrainMachine LearningNeuroimagingStrokeAdultAgedDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingSeverity of Illness IndexAphasiaAphasia predictionDTIfMRIMachine learningMRIMulti-modal

Identifiers

PMID40554033
PMCPMC12261925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.