Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553813›Full record

ArticleChest2025

Components Necessary for High-Quality Lung Cancer Screening: A 10-Year Update.

Julie A Barta, Douglas Arenberg, Leah Backhus, Frank Detterbeck, Michael K Gould, Viswam S Nair, Mary Pasquinelli, Charles A Powell, Kim Sandler, Gerard Silvestri and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improving lung cancer screening diagnostic efficiency.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Julie A BartaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: Julie.Barta@jefferson.edu.
Douglas ArenbergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Leah BackhusDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Frank DetterbeckDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Michael K GouldDepartment of Health System Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine. Pasadena, CA.
Viswam S NairClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Mary PasquinelliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Charles A PowellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Kim SandlerDepartment of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Gerard SilvestriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Matthew TripletteClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Anil VachaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Philadelphia VA and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Renda S WienerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep, and Critical Care Medicine, Boston VA and Boston University, Boston, MA.
Peter J MazzoneRespiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer screening (LCS) has evolved over the past decade with research advances and clinical experience helping to define target populations for screening, improve lung nodule detection and management, and identify structural components of programs that improve the quality of screening delivery. The 2015 American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society policy statement "Components Necessary for High-Quality Lung Cancer Screening" identified 9 essential components for high-quality LCS. Ten years later, optimizing the balance between the benefits and harms of LCS and ensuring equitable screening among all population groups remain fundamental objectives. In this 2025 update, we aimed to summarize new knowledge and highlight critical components that are needed for providing high-quality LCS. A multidisciplinary group of LCS experts was assembled to review evidence from the past 10 years. The original components were reviewed and updated to develop 8 refined components that should be considered essential structural elements of screening programs. Each component recommended by the authors is supported by an evidence update. Applying this framework will allow screening programs across the country to ensure implementation of high-quality, net-benefit LCS.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth PolicyLung NeoplasmsMass ScreeningHealth Plan ImplementationHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareReview Literature as TopicSocieties, MedicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited Statescigarette smokinglow-dose CTlung cancerlung cancer screeningtobacco treatment

Identifiers

PMID40553813
PMCPMC12831087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.