ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2025
Unifying perspectives on the activity and genotypic targeting of pharmacological chaperones.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- New Fluorescent Probes for Visual Proteins. Part III. Probing Auxiliary Gateways and the Stepwise Activation Model of Ligand Transport.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- Disease associated missense substitutions disrupt structural stability and catalytic function of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Public Cohort Analysis Identifies Thyroglobulin Variants as Hypothyroidism Risk Factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several diseases of protein misfolding can now be treated with an emerging class of therapeutics known as pharmacological chaperones, pharmacochaperones, or correctors. These small molecules exploit the universal thermodynamic coupling between ligand binding and protein folding to suppress conformational defects that disrupt protein homeostasis. While the mechanistic basis of their activity is quite simple in theory, their nuanced proteostatic effects can vary depending on the intrinsic properties of their target proteins and the cellular context. Deviations in activity are especially pronounced across panels of pathogenic variants of the target protein. In this perspective, we explore the factors that shape the potency of pharmacochaperones and the intrinsic sensitivity of different target proteins in relation to various theoretical considerations and experimental observations. We discuss how emerging technologies have provided general insights into the molecular basis of the variant-specific effects of certain pharmacochaperones. We also highlight ongoing efforts to identify existing drugs that stabilize misfolded variants and to repurpose them as pharmacochaperones. Finally, we discuss how the chaperone activity of current drugs could potentially contribute to complex pharmacology and deviations in therapeutic efficacy across patient cohorts. Together, these principles provide a coherent framework that may help guide the discovery and precision targeting of next-generation pharmacochaperones for both current and new targets involved in proteostasis diseases. An audio recording of this work is included in the supplement and can be freely streamed here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.