Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553708›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Public health2025

Universal health coverage in the context of migration and displacement: a cosmopolitan perspective.

Santino Severoni, Claudia Marotta, Josephine Borghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santino SeveroniDepartment of Health and Migration, Health and Migration Programme, Division of Universal Health Coverage and Healthier Populations, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Claudia MarottaDepartment of Health and Migration, Health and Migration Programme, Division of Universal Health Coverage and Healthier Populations, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Josephine BorghiSocial Cohesion, Health, and Wellbeing Research Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migration and displacement are reshaping societies and economies with profound implications for health equity and universal health coverage (UHC). In this Viewpoint, we review the unique health challenges faced by migrants and displaced people, as well as the limitations of current UHC policies and financing arrangements. We propose a cosmopolitan approach to UHC, grounded in global solidarity and structured around four pillars: supranational financing, integrated cross-border care, harmonised legal frameworks, and long-term investment in inclusive health systems. We also explore what this approach could mean practically for regional or global financing mechanisms and sources of funding, including progressive contributions and the integration of health into climate finance. Achieving equitable and effective UHC in a world shaped by mobility and crisis requires global thinking and collective action. We call for a reimagining of UHC via a cosmopolitan approach, which offers a pathway to reframe health and wellbeing as a shared right and responsibility, transcending national borders.

Indexed as

Emigration and ImmigrationRefugeesTransients and MigrantsUniversal Health InsuranceGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40553708
PMCPMC12303859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.