Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553512›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Wearable Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence Map.

Yue Sun, Ji Chen, Mengmeng Ji, Xiaomei Li

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue SunSchool of Nursing, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-2090
Ji ChenMianyang Research Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-0160
Mengmeng JiDepartment of Endocrinology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-0087
Xiaomei LiSchool of Nursing, Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-5520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demand for wearable technologies has surged in recent years, demonstrating remarkable potential, especially in health promotion. However, there is currently a lack of clarity about the types and roles of wearable devices in health care of older adults.

objectiveThis review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and categorize the current research conducted with wearable devices for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework and synthesized the results. A total of 6 databases were searched to identify wearable devices reported in studies from inception to July 28, 2024. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by 2 reviewers. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer when necessary. The types of results from relevant studies were systematically mapped into predefined categories.

resultsBased on the inclusion criteria, 109 studies were included. The most commonly reported health targets of wearable devices were mobility, mental health, fall-related, arrhythmia detection, activity recognition, disease diagnosis, and sleep monitoring. Most studies were application design and observational study, and in European countries and the United States, 51 studies of the participants were healthy. The most popular anatomical landmarks for wearable placement were the wrist, waist, and chest. Two evaluation approaches for wearable devices were used: performance metrics in controlled settings and real-world assessments with end users. The opportunities presented by wearable devices are countered by multiple challenges, including data availability and reliability, technical limitations, utility and user acceptance, cost, security and privacy, performance gaps, and challenges.

conclusionsWearable devices hold great promise for promoting health in older adults, but several hurdles remain for full adoption. A broader and more diverse group of older adults is needed to identify the most beneficial wearables and to optimize the technology. Further studies are required to statistically synthesize real-world performance and evaluation results. We hope that this review will serve as a valuable reference for the development of wearable devices in older adults.

Indexed as

Health PromotionWearable Electronic DevicesAgedHumansevidence mapolder adultsscoping reviewsystematic reviewwearable technology

Identifiers

PMID40553512
PMCPMC12238792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.