ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Wearable Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence Map.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interactive interfaces and wearable technologies for enhancing health management among older adults: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Severity of depression and anxiety symptoms is reflected in physiological and behavioral metrics collected from a consumer-grade wearable ring.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Climate Change and Sarcopenia: Mechanisms, Vulnerabilities, and Public Health Implications.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- BioLAMR: A Biomimetically Inspired Large Language Model Adaptation Framework for Automatic Modulation Recognition.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Providing Tech Support as Care Work Among Care Workers in Assisted Living Facilities: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Feasibility of integrating genetic risk and digital health tools for cardiovascular prevention: the FitPreV protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: technology-driven solutions to overcome food insecurity and improve nutrition access for older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Article
- Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation Using Wearable Digital Technologies: The Emerging Role of Smartwatches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Wearable Sensor Technologies and Gait Analysis for Early Detection of Dementia: Trends and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Every Step Counts-How Can We Accurately Count Steps with Wearable Sensors During Activities of Daily Living in Individuals with Neurological Conditions?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe demand for wearable technologies has surged in recent years, demonstrating remarkable potential, especially in health promotion. However, there is currently a lack of clarity about the types and roles of wearable devices in health care of older adults.
objectiveThis review aims to provide a comprehensive overview and categorize the current research conducted with wearable devices for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults.
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework and synthesized the results. A total of 6 databases were searched to identify wearable devices reported in studies from inception to July 28, 2024. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by 2 reviewers. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer when necessary. The types of results from relevant studies were systematically mapped into predefined categories.
resultsBased on the inclusion criteria, 109 studies were included. The most commonly reported health targets of wearable devices were mobility, mental health, fall-related, arrhythmia detection, activity recognition, disease diagnosis, and sleep monitoring. Most studies were application design and observational study, and in European countries and the United States, 51 studies of the participants were healthy. The most popular anatomical landmarks for wearable placement were the wrist, waist, and chest. Two evaluation approaches for wearable devices were used: performance metrics in controlled settings and real-world assessments with end users. The opportunities presented by wearable devices are countered by multiple challenges, including data availability and reliability, technical limitations, utility and user acceptance, cost, security and privacy, performance gaps, and challenges.
conclusionsWearable devices hold great promise for promoting health in older adults, but several hurdles remain for full adoption. A broader and more diverse group of older adults is needed to identify the most beneficial wearables and to optimize the technology. Further studies are required to statistically synthesize real-world performance and evaluation results. We hope that this review will serve as a valuable reference for the development of wearable devices in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.