Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553473›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2025

Breast Cancer Incidence Trends in Older US Women by Race, Ethnicity, Geography, and Stage.

Erica J Lee Argov, Michelle L Lui, Anita G Karr, Parisa Tehranifar, Rebecca D Kehm

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Social Drivers of Guideline-Discordant Breast Cancer Screening by Age and Mortality Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erica J Lee ArgovDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Michelle L LuiDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Anita G KarrDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Parisa TehranifarDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Rebecca D KehmDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Funding

Supplemental Training in Making Data FAIR and AI/ML ReadyT32ES007322 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Pam R Factor-Litvak, Allison Kupsco · 2000 to 2026
$12.1M
Characterizing the role of adolescent physical activity in early onset breast cancer risk for women across the familial risk continuumR00CA263024 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Rebecca D Kehm · 2024 to 2026
$847k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA263024NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Breast cancer (BC) incidence trends are known to vary by race, ethnicity, and geography among younger women. Less is known about trends among older women (aged ≥65 years), who are typically aggregated, despite different screening guidelines for those older than 74 years. Objective: To disaggregate US BC incidence trends among older women (ages 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years) according to stage at diagnosis, race and ethnicity, hormone receptor subtype, and geography. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study included women aged 65 years and older who were diagnosed with BC from January 2001 to December 2019. Data came from the US Cancer Statistics public use database, with information on women in all 50 US states. Data were analyzed from March to June 2024. Exposure: Age (65-74 years, 75-84 years, and ≥85 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-adjusted BC incidence rates were obtained, and average annual percent changes (AAPCs) from 2001 to 2019 were estimated using joinpoint regression for each age group, stratified by stage at diagnosis, race and ethnicity, and geography. Results: From 2001 to 2019, 2 278 611 women (1 249 750 [54.9%] aged 65-74 years; 119 287 [5.2%] Hispanic [all races], 205 738 [9.0%] non-Hispanic Black, and 1 826 084 [80.1%] non-Hispanic White) were diagnosed with BC. Age-adjusted BC incidence rates were 530.4 (95% CI, 529.5 to 531.3) per 100 000 persons, 515.3 (95% CI, 514.2 to 516.5) per 100 000 persons, and 376.8 (95% CI, 375.3 to 378.2) per 100 000 persons for ages 65 to 74 years, 75 to 84 years, and 85 years and older, respectively. Annually, incidence rates increased in women aged 65 to 74 years (AAPC, 0.4%, 95% CI, 0.2% to 0.6%), remained stable in women aged 75 to 84 years, and decreased in women aged 85 years or older (AAPC, -1.1%, 95% CI, -1.4% to -0.8%). In women aged 65 to 74 years, the AAPC was 7 to 11 times higher in Hispanic, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, and non-Hispanic Black women compared with non-Hispanic White women. Across all age groups, regional stage diagnoses decreased (ages ≥65 years: AAPC, -0.8%, 95% CI, -1.1% to -0.5%), while distant stage diagnoses increased (ages ≥65 years: AAPC, 1.3%, 95% CI, 1.2% to 1.6%). Trends for in situ and localized diagnoses varied by age. Across all age groups, non-Hispanic Black women had the highest proportion of hormone receptor and ERBB2-negative cancers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cross-sectional analysis of BC incidence trends among older US women, racial and ethnic as well as stage-specific patterns differed across age groups, highlighting the importance of disaggregating BC incidence rates into age groups better aligned with screening guidelines. Future research is needed to directly examine the contribution of screening patterns to these trends and their impact on BC mortality.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEthnicityRacial GroupsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceNeoplasm StagingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40553473
PMCPMC12188358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.