Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553472›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Prior Expectations of Volatility Following Psychotherapy for Delusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Julia M Sheffield, Ali F Sloan, Philip R Corlett, Baxter P Rogers, Simon Vandekar, Jinyuan Liu, Kendall M Beals, Lauren M Hall, Taylor Gautier, Alexandra B Moussa-Tooks and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04748679 (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04748679 nacompletednot on this map

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Study Evaluating the Updating of Persecutory Beliefs

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled62ConditionsSchizophrenia, Psychosis, Persecutory DelusionArmsWorry Intervention, Befriending
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Julia M SheffieldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ali F SloanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Philip R CorlettDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Baxter P RogersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Simon VandekarDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jinyuan LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kendall M BealsDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.
Lauren M HallDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Taylor GautierGautier Behavioral Health, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Alexandra B Moussa-TooksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Lénie J TorregrossaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Margaret AcheeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kristan ArmstrongDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Neil D WoodwardDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kaylee BeltMental Health Cooperative, Nashville, Tennessee.
Daniel FreemanDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Louise IshamDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rowan DiamondDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aaron P BrinenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Stephan HeckersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS K23 MG126313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Persecutory delusions are common, distressing, and difficult to treat. Testing computational neuroscience models of delusions can identify new therapeutic targets. Objective: To determine whether change in delusion severity is associated with a corresponding change in volatility priors and brain activation estimated during a belief updating task. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 9, 2021, to December 5, 2023, within the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Psychiatric Hospital and at a community mental health center in Nashville, Tennessee. Participants were adults (aged between 18 and 65 years) with schizophrenia spectrum or delusional disorder and an active, persistent (≥3 months) persecutory delusion with strong conviction (>50%). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp)-based intervention or befriending therapy. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed from June 1 to October 31, 2024. Intervention: The CBTp was a manualized intervention targeting persecutory delusions. The befriending therapy involved engaging in conversations and activities focused on neutral topics. Both interventions were provided in person, lasted for 8 weeks, and included standard care. Standard care consisted of medication management and ancillary services. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were volatility priors (ie, prior expectations of volatility) derived from a 3-option probabilistic reversal learning task; persecutory delusion severity measured by the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS delusion subscale; score range: 0-16, with the highest score indicating severe preoccupation, distress, conviction, and functioning impact); and brain activation in the striatum and prefrontal cortex measured by blood oxygenation level-dependent signal change. Associations between volatility priors, clinical improvement, and change in neural activation were examined. Results: Sixty-two participants (median [range] age, 31 [19-63] years; 38 males [61%]) were randomly assigned to the CBTp (n = 32) or befriending therapy (n = 30) arms. A subgroup of 35 participants (57%) completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. Volatility priors decreased following treatment (F1,112 = 7.7 [P = .006]; Cohen d = 0.52 [95% CI, 0.15-0.90]), as did delusion severity (F1,112 = 59.7 [P < .001]; Cohen d = 1.50 [95% CI, 1.00-1.90]), across both groups. The decrease in volatility priors was not associated with clinical improvement in PSYRATS scores (F1,102.8 = 1.8 [P = .18]; Cohen d = 0.26 [95% CI, -0.12 to 0.65]). Activation in the caudate and prefrontal cortex significantly decreased following treatment. Decreased caudate activation was associated with decreased volatility priors (F1,58.3 = 16.6 [P < .001]; Cohen d = 1.07 [95% CI, 0.51-1.61]) but not with PSYRATS total scores. Associations remained significant after controlling for antipsychotic medication (F1,53 = 13.77; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that elevated volatility priors and associated activation in the caudate nucleus were amenable to change. Volatility priors could be a potential target for intervention in psychosis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04748679.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDelusionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40553472
PMCPMC12188364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.